Publications of the DCN Network
Research on digital constitutionalism has developed significantly in recent years, and the definition and parameters of digital constitutionalism are best seen in the aggregate scholarly output on the topic. With this in mind, the Digital Constitutionalism Network has compiled a list of its members’ recent publications in the field, to make such scholarly contributions more organized and accessible. Explore below the books, chapters, and articles published by members of the Network since 2018.
Barkhuff, G., Borenstein, J., Schiff, D., Uchidiuno, J., & Zegura, E. (2024, March). Considerations for Improving Comprehensive Undergraduate Computing Ethics Education. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (pp. 1560-1561).
Barkhuff, G., Uchidiuno, J., & Zegura, E. (2024, March). Should We Teach Computing Ethics to Master’s Students?. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (pp. 1562-1563).
Lim, J., Barkhuff, G., & Uchidiuno, J. (2024, March). Increasing Access to CS Instruction in Low-Income Afterschool Settings. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (pp. 1720-1721).
Ricks, V., Magnani, M., Fiesler, C., Barkhuff, G., Doore, S., Brooks, A., & Zimmer, M. (2024, March). Teaching Ethics In CS Programs-Questions, Models, Resources, Assessments. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2 (pp. 1921-1921).
Bayer, J. (2024). The EU policy on disinformation: aims and legal basis. Journal of Media Law, 16(1), 18-27.
Bayer, J. (2024). The place of content ranking algorithms on the AI risk spectrum. Telecommunications Policy, 48(5), 102741.
Bayer, J. (2022). Procedural rights as safeguard for human rights in platform regulation. Policy & Internet, 14(4), 755-771.
Bayer, J., Holznagel, B., Lubianiec, K., Pintea, A., Schmitt, J. B., Szakács, J., & Uszkiewicz, E. (2021). Disinformation and propaganda: impact on the functioning of the rule of law and democratic processes in the EU and its Member States. European Union.
Bayer, J. (2021). Rights and duties of online platforms. Perspectives on platform regulation: Concepts and models of social media governance across the globe, 25-45.
Bayer, J. (2020). Double harm to voters: Data-driven micro-targeting and democratic public discourse. Internet Policy Review, 9(1), 1-17.
Bayer, J. (2018, August). Media freedom and pluralism: legislation and enforcement at the European level. In ERA Forum (Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 101-113). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Victorio, A. P., Celeste, E., & Quintavalla, A. (2024). Greening AI? The new principle of sustainable digital products and services in the EU. Common Market Law Review, 61(4), 1019-1044.
Celeste, E. (2024). Digital Constitutionalism, EU Digital Sovereignty Ambitions and the Role of the European Declaration on Digital Rights. In New Directions in Digitalisation: Perspectives from EU Competition Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights (pp. 255-271). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Celeste, E., & Dominioni, G. (2024). Digital and green: reconciling the EU twin transitions in times of war and energy crisis. In Fabbrini, F., & Petit, C. (Eds.), Research Handbook on Post-Pandemic EU Economic Governance and NGEU Law (pp. 161-178). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Celeste, E., & Formici, G. (2024). Constitutionalizing Mass Surveillance in the EU: Civil Society Demands, Judicial Activism, and Legislative Inertia. German Law Journal, 1-20.
Celeste, Ed., (2024). Digital Constitutionalism: A Socio-Legal Approach. European Data Protection Law Review, 10(2), 146-149.
Celeste, E., Iglesias Keller, C., & Redeker, D. (2024). Digital Bills of Rights. In De Gregorio, G., Pollicino, O., & P. Valcke (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Constitutionalism) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Celeste, E., & Nair, A. (2024). 2024: The Year of AI? Exploring the Role of Legal Scholarship and Interdisciplinary Research. European Journal of Law and Technology, 15(2).
Celeste, E., & Nair, A. (2023). Protecting the Vulnerable: from E-Administration to AI Liability. Editorial. European Journal of Law and Technology, 14.
Celeste, E., Redeker, D., Santaniello, M., & Digital Constitutionalism Network. (2023). Anchoring Digital Rights: Digital Constitutionalism in Hard Times. In Padovani, C., Wavre, V., Hintz, A., Goggin, G., & Iosifidis, P. (Eds.), Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads (pp. 217-237). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Celeste, E. (2023). Internet Bills of Rights: Generalisation and Re-specification Towards a Digital Constitution. Ind. J. Global Legal Stud., 30, 25.
Celeste, E., & De Gregorio, G. (2023). Towards a right to digital education? Constitutional challenges of edtech. J. Intell. Prop. Info. Tech. & Elec. Com. L., 14, 234.
Celeste, E., Palladino, N., Redeker, D., & Yilma, K. (2023). The content governance dilemma: digital constitutionalism, social media and the search for a global standard. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Celeste, E., Costello, R. Á., Harbinja, E., & Xanthoulis, N. (Eds.). (2023). Data protection and digital sovereignty post-Brexit. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Celeste, E. (2023). Digital constitutionalism: how fundamental rights are turning digital. In Sampaio, L., Adércio, J., Meire, F., Lavinia, A.B., Lima, N., Jocélia, M. (Eds.), A Inteligência Artificial a (De)serviço do Estado de Direito. (pp. 13-36). RTM, Belo Horizonte.
Celeste, E. (2022). Digital constitutionalism: The role of internet bills of rights. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
Celeste, E., Heldt, A., & Keller, C. I. (Eds.). (2022). Constitutionalising social media. Oxford: Hart.
Trestian, R., Celeste, E., Xie, G., Lohar, P., Bendechache, M., Brennan, R., & Ta, I. (2022, June). The privacy paradox-investigating people’s attitude towards privacy in a time of COVID-19. In 2022 14th International Conference on Communications (COMM) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Celeste, E., & De Gregorio, G. (2022). Digital humanism: The constitutional message of the GDPR. Global Privacy Law Review, 3(1).
Celeste, E., Palladino, N., Redeker, D., & Yilma, K. (2022). Digital constitutionalism: in search of a content governance standard. In Celeste, E., Heldt, A., & Keller, C. I. (Eds.), Constitutionalising social media. (pp. 267-87). Oxford: Hart.
Celeste, E. (2022). The Constitutionalisation of the digital ecosystem: Lessons from international law (pp. 47-74). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Bago, P., Castilho, S., Celeste, E., Dunne, J., Gaspari, F., Gíslason, N. R., Klubička, F., Kristmannsson, G., McHugh, H., Moran, R., Loinsigh, O., Olsen, J.A., Escartín, C.P., Ramesh, A., Resende, N., Sheridan, P., & Way, A. (2022). Sharing high-quality language resources in the legal domain to develop neural machine translation for under-resourced European languages. Revista de llengua i dret, 9-34.
Celeste, E., Montgomery, S., & Suriyawongkul, A. (2022). Digital technology and privacy attitudes in times of COVID-19: formal legality versus legal reality in Ireland. N. Ir. Legal Q., 73, 283.
Celeste, E. (2021). Data Protection. In Fabbrini, F. (Ed.), The law and politics of Brexit, Volume III: The Framework of New EU-UK Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Trestian, R., Xie, G., Lohar, P., Celeste, E., Bendechache, M., Brennan, R., & Tal, I. (2021, September). Privatt-a closer look at people’s data privacy attitudes in times of covid-19. In 2021 IEEE International Mediterranean Conference on Communications and Networking (MeditCom) (pp. 174-179). IEEE.
Celeste, E. (2021). Digital sovereignty in the EU: challenges and future perspectives. In Fabbrini F et al (eds) Data protection beyond borders: transatlantic perspectives on extraterritoriality and sovereignty. (Oxford/London/New York?): Hart.
Celeste, E. (2021). Digital constitutionalism: mapping the constitutional response to digital technology’s challenges. Direitos Fundamentais & Justica, 45, 63.
Lohar, P., Xie, G., Bendechache, M., Brennan, R., Celeste, E., Trestian, R., & Tal, I. (2021, August). Irish attitudes toward COVID tracker app & privacy: sentiment analysis on Twitter and survey data. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (pp. 1-8).
Celeste, E. (2021). Digital punishment: social media exclusion and the constitutionalising role of national courts. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 35(2), 162-184.
Fabbrini, F., Celeste, E., & Quinn, J. (Eds.). (2021). Data protection beyond borders: Transatlantic perspectives on extraterritoriality and sovereignty. Hart Publishing.
Celeste, E., & Shengelia, N. (2021). Regulating online disinformation: comparative perspectives. International Journal of Social Science (Tiblisi), 1(1).
Trestian, R., Xie, G., Lohar, P., Celeste, E., Bendechache, M., Brennan, R., & Tal, I. (2021). Privacy in a time of covid-19: How concerned are you?. IEEE Security & Privacy, 19(5), 26-35.
Celeste, E. & Fabbrini, F. (2021). EU data protection law between extraterritoriality and sovereignty. In Fabbrini F et al (eds) Data protection beyond borders: transatlantic perspectives on extraterritoriality and sovereignty. (Oxford/London/New York?): Hart.
Celeste, E. (2020). A colpi di tweet: Social network, pubblica amministrazione e politica. Istituzioni del Federalismo, 41(1), 121-154.
Celeste, E. (2020). Digital Constitutionalism: The Role of Internet Bills of Rights (Doctoral dissertation, University College Dublin. School of Law).
Celeste, E. (2020). Social media and politics: the legal value of a tweet. Rivista de MediaLaw, 188-193.
Celeste, E., & Fabbrini, F. (2020). Targeted surveillance: can privacy and surveillance be reconciled?. 20 years anniversary of the Tampere Programme: Europeanisation dynamics of the EU area of freedom, security and justice, 295-307.
Fabbrini, F., & Celeste, E. (2020). The right to be forgotten in the digital age: The challenges of data protection beyond borders. German law journal, 21(S1), 55-65.
Celeste, E., & Fabbrini, F. (2020). Competing jurisdictions: Data privacy across the borders. Data Privacy and Trust in Cloud Computing, 43-58.
Celeste, E. (2019). The Court of Justice and the ban on bulk data retention: expansive potential and future scenarios. European Constitutional Law Review, 15(1), 134-157.
Celeste, E. (2019). Digital constitutionalism: a new systematic theorisation. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 33(1), 76-99.
Celeste, E. (2019). Terms of service and bills of rights: new mechanisms of constitutionalisation in the social media environment?. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 33(2), 122-138.
Celeste, E., & Iglesias Keller, C. (2019). Future Visions for a Democratic Internet. Publicum, 5(2), ii-viii.
Gregorio, G. D., & Demková, S. (2024). The constitutional right to an effective remedy in the digital age: a perspective from Europe. In Cvan Oirsouw, C., de Poorter, J., Leijten, I., van der Schyff, G., Stremler, M., De Visser, M. (Eds.), European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2023. European Yearbook of Constitutional Law, vol 5. (pp. 223-254). The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-647-5_10.
Goanta, C., de Gregorio, G., & Spanakis, J. (2024, October). Consumer Protection and Digital Vulnerability: Common and Diverging Paths. In The New Shapes of Digital Vulnerability in European Private Law (pp. 31-52). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
Brogi, E., & De Gregorio, G. (2024). From the code of practice to the code of conduct? Navigating the future challenges of disinformation regulation. Journal of Media Law, 16(1), 38-46.
De Gregorio, G. (2023). The Normative Power of Artificial Intelligence. Ind. J. Global Legal Stud., 30, 55.
De Gregorio, G., & Stremlau, N. (2023). Inequalities and content moderation. Global Policy, 14(5), 870-879.
De Gregorio, G., & Stremlau, N. (2023). Online content moderation during conflict. In Coleman, S., & Freelon, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Digital Politics (pp. 259-286). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
De Gregorio, G., & Dunn, P. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Freedom of Expression. In Temperman, J., & Quintavalla, A. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 76-90.
de Abreu Duarte, F., De Gregorio, G., & Golia, A. (2023). Perspectives on digital constitutionalism. In Research Handbook on Law and Technology (pp. 315-329). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Celeste, E., & De Gregorio, G. (2023). Towards a right to digital education? Constitutional challenges of edtech. J. Intell. Prop. Info. Tech. & Elec. Com. L., 14, 234.
Quintais, J. P., De Gregorio, G., & Magalhães, J. C. (2023). How platforms govern users’ copyright-protected content: Exploring the power of private ordering and its implications. Computer Law & Security Review, 48, 105792.
Radu, R., & De Gregorio, G. (2023). The new era of internet governance: technical fragmentation and digital sovereignty entanglements. In Cristiano, F. & Van der berg, B., Hybridity, Conflict, and the Global Politics of Cybersecurity (pp. 15-30). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
De Gregorio, G., & Pollicino, O. (2023). Courts, rights and powers in the digital age. In Social Media, Fundamental Rights and Courts (pp. 242-256). Abingdon: Routledge.
De Gregorio, G., & Goanta, C. (2022). The influencer republic: Monetizing political speech on social media. German Law Journal, 23(2), 204-225.
Celeste, E., & De Gregorio, G. (2022). Digital humanism: The constitutional message of the GDPR. Global Privacy Law Review, 3(1).
Pollicino, O., & De Gregorio, G. (2022). Constitutional Democracy, Platform Powers and Digital Populism. Const. Stud., 8, 11.
De Gregorio, G. (2022). Digital constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing rights and powers in the algorithmic society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunn, P., & De Gregorio, G. (2022). The Ambiguous Risk-Based Approach of the Artificial Intelligence Act: Links and Discrepancies with Other Union Strategies. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Imagining the AI Landscape after the AI Act (IAIL 2022).
De Gregorio, G., & Radu, R. (2022). Digital constitutionalism in the new era of Internet governance. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 30(1), 68-87.
De Gregorio, G., & Dunn, P. (2022). The European risk-based approaches: Connecting constitutional dots in the digital age. Common Market Law Review, 59(2).
De Gregorio, G. (2022). Digital constitutionalism across the Atlantic. Global Constitutionalism, 11(2), 297-324.
De Gregorio, G. (2021). The rise of digital constitutionalism in the European Union. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(1), 41-70.
De Gregorio, G. (2021). Regulating geo-blocking discriminatory practices in the digital single market. In Research handbook on EU media law and policy (pp. 190-207). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
De Gregorio, G., & Stremlau, N. (2021). Platform governance at the periphery: moderation, shutdowns and intervention. In Bayer, J., Holznagel, B., Korpisaari, P., & Woods, L. (Eds.), Perspectives on Platform Regulation. Concepts and Models of Social Media Governance Across the Globe (pp. 433-450). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Elkin-Koren, N., De Gregorio, G., & Perel, M. (2021). Social Media as Contractual Networks: A Bottom Up Check on Content Moderation. Iowa L. Rev., 107, 987.
Pollicino, O., & De Gregorio, G. (2021). Constitutional law in the algorithmic society. In Micklitz, H.-W., Pollicino, O., Reichman, A., Simoncini, A., Sartor, G., & De Gregorio G., (Eds.), Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society (pp. 3-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi, 10, 9781108914857.
De Gregorio, G. (2020). Democratising online content moderation: A constitutional framework. Computer Law & Security Review, 36, 105374.
De Gregorio, G., & Stremlau, N. (2020). Internet shutdowns and the limits of law. International Journal of Communication, 14.
De Gregorio, G. (2018). Expressions on platforms: freedom of expression and ISP liability in the European digital single market. Eur. Competition & Reg. L. Rev., 2, 203.
Pollicino, O., & De Gregorio, G. (2019). A Constitutional-Driven Change of Heart: ISP Liability and Artificial Intelligence in the Digital Single Market. In Capaldo, G.Z. (Ed.), The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2018 (pp. 237-264). New York: Oxford University Press.
Pajno, A., Bassini, M., De Gregorio, G., Macchia, M., Patti, F. P., Pollicino, O., Quattrocolo, S. Simeoli, D., & Sirena, P. (2019). AI: profili giuridici. Intelligenza Artificiale: criticità emergenti e sfide per il giurista. BioLaw Journal-Rivista di BioDiritto, (3), 205-235.
Dinika, A. A. T. (2025). Trapped in the Matrix: Algorithmic Control and Worker Dispossession in the African Platform Economy. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 5(1).
Ndzendze, B. (2024). Digitalisation and governance, legislative oversight, and service delivery in Africa. Digital Policy Studies, 3(1), i-iii.
Dinika, A. A., & Sloane, M. (2023). AI and Inequality in Hiring and Recruiting: A Field Scan. In Weizenbaum Conference” AI, Big Data, Social Media, and People on the Move” (pp. 1-13). DEU.
Dvoskin, B. (2025). The Illusion of Inclusion: The False Promise of the New Governance Project for Content Moderation. Fordham Law Review.
Dvoskin, B. (2023). Expert Governance of Online Speech. Harv. Int’l LJ, 64, 85.
Dvoskin, B. (2022). Representation without elections: Civil society participation as a remedy for the democratic deficits of online speech governance. Vill. L. Rev., 67, 447.
Kettemann, M. C., Francke, J. (2023). Towards More Legitimacy in Rule-Making. M. C. Kettemann, J. Francke, C. Dinar, & L. Hinrichs (Eds.), Plattform://Democracy. Perspectives on Platform Power, Public Values and the Potential of Social Media Councils: Research Report Europe.
Kettemann, M. C., Esterhuysen, A. & Francke, J. (eds.) (2023). Platform://Democracy – Perspectives on Platform Power, Public Values and the Potential of Social Media Councils: Research Report Africa. Hans-Bredow-Institute for Media Research.
Kettemann, M. C., Tworek, H. & Francke, J. (eds.) (2023). Platform://Democracy – Perspectives on Platform Power, Public Values and the Potential of Social Media Councils: Research Report Americas. Hans-Bredow-Institute for Media Research.
Kettemann, M. C., Francke, J., Dinar, C. & Hinrichs, L. (eds.) (2023). Platform://Democracy – Perspectives on Platform Power, Public Values and the Potential of Social Media Councils: Research Report Asia-Pacific. Hans-Bredow-Institute for Media Research.
Kettemann, M. C., Francke, J., Dinar, C. & Hinrichs, L. (eds.) (2023). Platform://Democracy – Perspectives on Platform Power, Public Values and the Potential of Social Media Councils: Research Report Europe. Hans-Bredow-Institute for Media Research.
Franklin , M. I. (2024). (Accepted/In press) Digitalizing Human Rights for Sustainable Futures. In Kettemann, M. C., Montgomery, S., Vieth, K. & Wagner, B. (Eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Digital Technology. Second ed. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Franklin, M. I. (2024). Internet Decolonized. (Editor) & Zamurd-Butt, H. (Editor) (Accepted/In press) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Franklin , M. I. (2022). Life and Death at the Digitalized Border: ‘Access Denied’. In Pereira , S. & Pugliese, J. (Eds.), Mapping Deathscapes: Digital Geographies of Racial and Border Violence. Routledge, 164-182.
Franklin , M. I. (2020). University Life Corporatizing the Digital: Academic Agency Interrupted? In International Studies Perspectives. 21(1), 17-21.
Franklin, M. I. (2019). Human rights futures for the internet. In Wagner, B., Kettemann, M., & Vieth, K. (Eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Digital Technology (pp. 5-23). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Freuler, J. O. (2023). Unveiling Gatekeeping Practices in Mobile Environments: A Comparative Analysis of Operating Systems and App Gardens. International Journal of Communication, 17, 26.
Ortiz Freuler, J. (2021). The Neutrality Pyramid: A policy framework to distribute power over the net. Available at SSRN 3802263.
Gasser, U., & Palfrey, J. (2025), Advanced Introduction to Law and Digital Technologies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gasser, U., & Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2024), Guardrails: Guiding Human Decisions in the Age of AI. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gasser, U. (2023). An EU landmark for AI governance. Science, 15 June 2023, Vol 280, Issue 6651, 1203.
Kostick-Quenet, K., Mandl, K.D., Minssen, T., Cohen G.I., Gasser, U., Kohane, I., McGuire, A.L. (2022). How NFTs could transform health information exchange: Can patients regain control over their health information? Science, 3 Feb 2022, Vol 375, Issue 6580, 500-502.
Altman, M., Wood, A., O’Brien D.R., & Gasser, U. (2018). Practical Approaches to Big Data Privacy Over Time, 8 Int’l Data Privacy L., 29.
Graber, C. B. (2023). Net Neutrality: A Fundamental Right in the Digital Constitution?. Ind. J. Global Legal Stud., 30, 197.
Graber, C. B. (2021). How the law learns in the digital society. Law, Technology and humans, 3(2), 12-27.
Graber, C. B. (2020). Artificial intelligence, affordances and fundamental rights. In Hildebrandt, M., & O’Hara, K. (Eds.), Life and the law in the era of data-driven agency (pp. 194-213). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jo, G. W. (2024). The New Social Contract and the Digital Bill of Rights: Focusing on Political and Social Context and Institutionalization. Informatization Policy, 31(1), 53-71.
Leerssen, P., Heldt, A. P., & Kettemann, M. C. (2023). Scraping By? Europe’s law and policy on social media research access. In C. Strippel, S. Paasch-Colberg, M. Emmer, & J. Trebbe (Eds.), Challenges and perspectives of hate speech research, (pp. 405–425). Berlin, Germany: Digital Communication Research.
Heldt, A. (2023). Intensivere Drittwirkung: Die mittelbare Drittwirkung der Meinungsfreiheit in Öffentlichkeiten der digitalen Gesellschaft. Eine verfassungsrechtliche, rechtsvergleichende und interdisziplinäre Analyse. Mohr Siebeck.
Heldt, A. (2022). Gearing up for the Digital Decade? Assessing the enforcement mechanisms of the EU’s platform regulation bills. Heinrich Boll Foundation.
Heldt, A. (2022). Content moderation by social media platforms: The importance of judicial review. In Celeste, E., Heldt, A., & Keller, C. I. (Eds.), Constitutionalising social media. (pp. 251-265). Oxford: Hart.
Heldt, A. P. (2022). EU Digital Services Act: The white hope of intermediary regulation. In Flew, T., & Martin, F. (Eds.), Digital Platform Regulation: Global Perspectives on Internet Governance (pp. 69-84). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Rau, J., Kero, S., Hofmann, V., Dinar, C., & Heldt, A. P. (2022). Rechtsextreme Online-Kommunikation in Krisenzeiten: Herausforderungen und Interventionsmöglichkeiten aus Sicht der Rechtsextremismus-und Platform-Governance-Forschung (Vol. 62, p. 76). Verlag Hans-Bredow-Institut.
Celeste, E., Heldt, A., & Keller, C. I. (Eds.). (2022). Constitutionalising social media. Oxford: Hart.
Makhortykh, M., Urman, A., Münch, F. V., Heldt, A., Dreyer, S., & Kettemann, M. C. (2022). Not all who are bots are evil: A cross-platform analysis of automated agent governance. New media & society, 24(4), 964-981.
Heldt, A., & Dreyer, S. (2021). Competent third parties and content moderation on platforms: Potentials of independent decision-making bodies from a governance structure perspective. Journal of Information Policy, 11, 266-300.
Heldt, A. P. (2021). Intermediärsregulierung: Quo Vadis NetzDG & Co?. UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft, 84(2), 529-542.
Heldt, A. (2020). The President and Free Speech: Consequences of Twitter’s Fact-Checking Indication. Internet Policy Review.
Heldt, A. (2020). Germany is amending its online speech act NetzDG… but not only that. Internet Policy Review, 6.
Heldt, A. (2019). Reading between the lines and the numbers: An analysis of the first NetzDG reports. Internet Policy Review, 8(2), 1-18.
Heldt, A. (2019). Let’s meet halfway: Sharing new responsibilities in a Digital age. Journal of Information Policy, 9, 336-369.
Heldt, A. P. (2019). Upload-Filers: Bypassing Classical Concepts of Censorship. J. Intell. Prop. Info. Tech. & Elec. Com. L., 10, 56.
Heldt, A. P. (2019). Merging the social and the public: How social media platforms could be a new public forum. Mitchell Hamline L. Rev., 46, 997.
Schulz, W., Kettemann, M. C., & Heldt, A. P. (2019). Probleme und Potenziale des NetzDG-ein Reader mit fünf HBI-Expertisen (Vol. 48, p. 77). DEU.
Heldt, A. P. (2018). Intelligente Upload-Filter: Bedrohung für die Meinungsfreiheit?. 57518, 392-416.
Keller, C. I., & dos Santos, B. M. (2024). Trackers and Chasers: Governance Challenges in Disinformation Datafication. In Global Digital Data Governance (pp. 148-164). Routledge.
Hofmann, J., & Iglesias Keller, C. (2024). Machine learning, political participation and the transformations of democratic self-determination. In Künstliche Intelligenz, Mensch und Gesellschaft: Soziale Dynamiken und gesellschaftliche Folgen einer technologischen Innovation (pp. 321-344). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Celeste, E., Iglesias Keller, C., & Redeker, D. (2024). Digital Bills of Rights. In De Gregorio, G., Pollicino, O., & P. Valcke (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Constitutionalism) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neuberger, C., Emmer, M., Keller, C. I., Krasnova, H., Krzywdzinski, M., Metzger, A., & Vladova, G. (2023). Special Issue: Fostering Societal Values in Digital Times–Peace, Care, and Tech Regulation. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 3(3).
Keller, C. I., & Magalhães, J. C. (2023). Regulating AI in democratic erosion: context, imaginaries and voices in the Brazilian debate. In Elgar Companion to Regulating AI and Big Data in Emerging Economies (pp. 183-200). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Iglesias Keller, C. (2022). Don’t shoot the message: Regulating disinformation beyond content. In The Rule of Law in Cyberspace (pp. 309-330). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Pereira, J. R. G., & Keller, C. I. (2022). Constitucionalismo Digital: contradições de um conceito impreciso. Revista Direito e Práxis, 13(4), 2648-2689.
Celeste, E., Heldt, A., & Keller, C. I. (Eds.). (2022). Constitutionalising social media. Oxford: Hart.
Haggart, B., & Keller, C. I. (2021). Democratic legitimacy in global platform governance. Telecommunications Policy, 45(6), 102152.
Iglesias Keller, C. (2021). Don’t shoot the message: regulating disinformation beyond content. Direito Público, 18(99), 486-515.
Keller, C. I. (2019). Entre exceção e harmonização: o debate teórico sobre a regulação da Internet| Between exception and harmonization: the theoretical debate on Internet regulation. Revista Publicum, 5(1), 137-166.
Keller, C. I. (2019). Regulação nacional de serviços na Internet: exceção, legitimidade e o papel do Estado.
Keller, C. I. (2019). Exception and Harmonization: Three Theoretical Debates on Internet Regulation. HIIG Discussion Paper Series, 2020(2).
Celeste, E., & Iglesias Keller, C. (2019). Future Visions for a Democratic Internet. Publicum, 5(2), ii-viii.
Koniakou, V., Pouloudi, N., Chronaki, V., & Lekakos, G. (2024). Identifying Stakeholders Of Children’s Digital Maturity: Looking Beyond Digital Literacy.
Koniakou, V. (2023). From the “rush to ethics” to the “race for governance” in Artificial Intelligence. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 71-102.
Benjamins, R., Rubio Viñuela, Y., & Alonso, C. (2023). Social and ethical challenges of the metaverse: Opening the debate. AI and Ethics, 3(3), 689-697.
Koniakou, V. (2021, August). Governing Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Decision Making: Human Rights and Beyond. In Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society (pp. 173-184). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Koniakou, V. (2019). Technological Determinism and Democracy in the Governance of the Logical Layer of the Internet| Determinismo tecnológico e democracia na governança da camada lógica da Internet. Revista Publicum, 5(2), 36-72.
Kulesza, J. (2023). Human Rights and Social Media: Challenges and Opportunities for Human Rights Education. Polarization, Shifting Borders and Liquid Governance: Studies on Transformation and Development in the OSCE Region, 139-154.
Kulesza, J., & Weber, R. H. (2021). Protecting the Internet with international law. Computer Law & Security Review, 40, 105531.
Kulesza, J. (2020). Right to be forgotten in the global information economy. In Comparative Privacy and Defamation (pp. 216-228). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jørgensen, R. F. (2024). Digital welfare–From the perspective of Nordic values and rights. Nordisk välfärdsforskning, (2), 193-198.
Akhtar, M., & Jørgensen, R. F. (2024). A rights-based approach to automated decision-making in the public sector. In Artificial Intelligence and International Human Rights Law (pp. 69-85). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jørgensen, R. F. (2023). Data and rights in the digital welfare state: the case of Denmark. Information, Communication & Society, 26(1), 123-138.
Flyverbom, M., Jørgensen, R. F., Oehlenschläger, M., Michaelsen, M., Svarre, P., Tranberg, P., … & ekspertgruppe TECH-GIGANTER, R. (2023). Demokratisk kontrol over tech-giganternes forretning. Politiken, 5-6.
Søe, S. O., Jørgensen, R. F., & Mai, J. E. (2021). What is the ‘personal’in ‘personal information’?. Ethics and Information Technology, 23, 625-633.
Jørgensen, R. F., & Zuleta, L. (2020). Private Governance of Freedom of Expression on Social Media Platforms: EU content regulation through the lens of human rights standards. Nordicom Review, 41(1), 51-67.
Jørgensen, R. F. (2019). Human rights in the age of platforms. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Jørgensen, R. F. (2019). When private actors govern human rights. In Wagner, B., Kettemann, M., & Vieth, K. (Eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Digital Technology (pp. 346-363). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jørgensen, R. F., Veiberg, C. B., & ten Oever, N. (2019). Exploring the role of HRIA in the information and communication technologies (ICT) sector. In Handbook on human rights impact assessment (pp. 205-218). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jørgensen, R. F. (2018). Human rights and private actors in the online domain. New technologies for human rights law and practice, 243, 253.
Maroni, M. (2023). “Mediated transparency”: The Digital Services Act and the legitimisation of platform power. In Hillebrandt, M., Leino-Sandberg, P. & Koivisto, I. (Eds.), (In) visible European Government (pp. 305-326). Abingdon: Routledge.
Maroni, M., Ojanen, T., & Ignatius, E. (2023). A rights-based approach to social media under the midnight sun: Social media before courts and other constitutional actors in Finland. In Casarosa, F. & Psychogiopoulou , E. (Eds.), Social Media, Fundamental Rights and Courts (pp. 89-104). 1st edition, London: Routledge.
Maroni, M. (2022). The Right to Access The Internet: A Critical Analysis of The Constitutionalisation of The Internet. Dissertation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Maroni, M. (2022). ICANN and the ITU. In J. Klabbers (Ed.), International Organizations Engaging the World. Cambridge University Press.
Brogi, E., Maroni, M., & Verza, S. (2022). La responsabilità delle piattaforme online: l’evoluzione normativa europea. In Brogi, E. & M. Mariani (Eds.), Temi Di Diritto Dell’informazione E Della Comunicazione (pp. 355-368). Milan: Key Editore Srl.
Maroni, M., & Brogi, E. (2021). Freedom of expression and the rule of law: the debate in the context of online platform regulation. In Parcu, P. L. & Brogi, E. (Eds.), Research handbook on EU media law and policy (pp. 166-189). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Maroni, M. (2021). An Open Internet? The Court of Justice of the European Union between Network Neutrality and Zero Rating: ECJ (Grand Chamber) 15 September 2020, Joined Cases C-807/18 and C-39/19, Telenor Magyarország Zrt v Nemzeti Média-és Hírközlési Hatóság Elnöke. European Constitutional Law Review, 17(3), 517-537.
Maroni, M. (2020). The liability of internet intermediaries and the European Court of Human Rights. In Petkova, B. & Ojanen, T. (Eds.), Fundamental Rights Protection Online: The Future Regulation of Intermediaries (pp. 255-278). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Maroni, M. (2019). Some reflections on the announced Facebook Oversight Board. EUI Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom.
Maroni, M. (2019). A Court’s Gotta Do, What a Court’s Gotta Do. An analysis of the European Court of Human Rights and the liability of internet intermediaries through systems theory. An Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights and the Liability of Internet Intermediaries Through Systems Theory (March 2019). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS, 20.
Maroni, M., & Brogi, E. (17 Oct. 2019). Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Limited: a new layer of neutrality. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF).
Padovani, C., Montiel, A. V., Shala, A., & Cerqueira, C. (2023). A New Gender Deal for Media and Digital Communications. In Padovani, C., Wavre, V., Hintz, A., Goggin, G., & Iosifidis, P. (Eds.), Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads, (pp. 259-280). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Padovani, C. (2023). Gender Dimensions of Communication Governance: Perspectives, Principles, and Practices. In Gallagher, M. & Montiel, A. V. (Eds.), The Handbook of Gender, Communication, and Women’s Human Rights, (pp. 15-33). Hoboken: Wiley & Sons.
Nieminen, H., Padovani, C., & Sousa, H. (2023). Why has the EU been late in regulating social media platforms?. Javnost-The Public, 30(2), 174-196.
Padovani, C., Belluati, M., Karadimitriou, A., Horz-Ishak, C., & Baroni, A. (2022). Gender inequalities in and through the media: Comparing gender inequalities in the media across countries. In Success and failure in news media performance: Comparative analysis in the Media for Democracy Monitor 2021, (pp. 101-125). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
Azzalini, M., & Padovani, C. (2021). Genere e media in Italia nel contesto della pandemia Covid-19: i risultati del GMMP 2020. Problemi dell’informazione, 46(3), 495-500.
Padovani, C. (2020). [Equità Di Genere] Cultura e comunicazione al centro dei processi di rinascita?. Letture lente.
Padovani, C., & Ross, K. (2020). Ideas for gender-transformative futures of education in the digital age. Humanistic futures of learning: Perspectives from UNESCO Chairs and UNITWIN Networks. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, 153-156.
Padovani, C., & Bozzon, R. (2020). Media gender equality regimes: Exploring media organizations’ policy adoption across nations. In Djerf-Pierre, M., & Edström, M. (Eds.), Comparing Gender and Media Equality Across the Globe A Cross-National Study of the Qualities, Causes, and Consequences of Gender Equality in and through the News Media (pp. 99-144). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
Padovani, C. (2020). Gender and media policy. The international encyclopedia of gender, media, and communication, 1-11.
Padovani, C. (2020). Learning and teaching gender in the digital age: insights and reflections on the AGEMI project. Journalism Education, 9, 19-30.
Padovani, C. (2019). Women in Beijing+ 25 and in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A Comparison. Economia della Cultura, 29(4), 579-583.
Padovani, C., & Ross, K. (2019). Advancing gender equality in media industries: an innovative european approach. Inter disciplina, 7(17), 87-98.
Padovani, C., & Ross, K. (2019). Re-booting gender in communication research and practice: a translational approach. ECREA 2018 special panel report. Studies in Communication Sciences, 19(2), 211-215.
Padovani, C. (2019). Beijing+ 25: Tacking Stock and Actualizing Section J through Transnational Collaboration. Economia della Cultura, (4), 477-489.
Padovani, C., Raeymaeckers, K., & De Vuyst, S. (2019). Transforming the news media: Overcoming old and new gender inequalities. In Trappel, J. (Ed.) Digital media inequalities: Policies against divides, distrust and discrimination. (pp. 159-77). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
Padovani, C., & Santaniello, M. (2018). Digital constitutionalism: Fundamental rights and power limitation in the Internet eco-system. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 295-301.
Padovani, C. (2018). Gendering media policy research and communication governance. Javnost-The Public, 25(1-2), 256-264.
Palladino, N. (2023). A ‘biased’ emerging governance regime for artificial intelligence? How AI ethics get skewed moving from principles to practices. Telecommunications Policy, 47(5).
Celeste, E., Palladino, N., Redeker, D., & Yilma, K. (2023). The content governance dilemma: digital constitutionalism, social media and the search for a global standard (p. 143). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Palladino, N. (2023). A digital constitutionalism framework for Ai. Rivista di Digital Politics, 3(3), 521-542.
Palladino, N. (2023). The Blind Watcher: Accountability Mechanisms In The Artificial Intelligence Act. In Belli, L., & Gasper, W. (eds.) The Quest for AI Sovereignty, Transparency and Accountability (pp. 145-160). United Nations Internet Governance Forum-FGV Direito Rio.
Santaniello, M., & Palladino, N. (2022). Discourse Coalitions. In Marzouki, M., and Calderaro, A. (Eds.), Internet Governance. Internet Diplomacy: Shaping the Global Politics of Cyberspace. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Celeste, E., Palladino, N., Redeker, D., & Yilma, K. (2022). Digital constitutionalism: in search of a content governance standard. In Celeste, E., Heldt, A., & Keller, C. I. (Eds.), Constitutionalising social media. (pp. 267-287). Oxford: Hart.
Palladino, N. (2021). The role of epistemic communities in the “constitutionalization” of internet governance: The example of the European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Telecommunications policy, 45(6), 102149.
Palladino, N., & Santaniello, M. (2020). Legitimacy, power, and inequalities in the multistakeholder Internet governance: Analyzing IANA transition. Cham: Springer Nature.
Santaniello, M., Palladino, N., Catone, M. C., & Diana, P. (2018). The language of digital constitutionalism and the role of national parliaments. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 320-336.
Pettrachin, A., & Pelizza, A. (2023). Data circulation and migration governance: a social-network-analysis method to track shifts in responsibilities. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 7(4), 363-384.
Pettrachin, A. (2018). Towards a universal declaration on internet rights and freedoms?. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 337-353.
Celeste, E., Iglesias Keller, C., & Redeker, D. (2024). Digital Bills of Rights. In De Gregorio, G., Pollicino, O., & P. Valcke (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Digital Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Katzenbach, C., Dergacheva, D., Fischer, A., Kopps, A., Kolesnikov, S., Redeker, D., & Viejo Otero, P. (2023). Platform Governance Archive (PGA): Dataset PGA v2 [Data Paper].
Celeste, E., Redeker, D., Santaniello, M., & Digital Constitutionalism Network. (2023). Anchoring Digital Rights: Digital Constitutionalism in Hard Times. In Padovani, C., Wavre, V., Hintz, A., Goggin, G., & Iosifidis, P. (Eds.), Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads (pp. 217-237). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Katzenbach, C., Kopps, A., Magalhães, J. C., Redeker, D., Sühr, T., & Wunderlich, L. (2023). The Platform Governance Archive v1: A longitudinal dataset to study the governance of communication and interactions by platforms and the historical evolution of platform policies (Data Paper). Center for Open Science.
Celeste, E., Palladino, N., Redeker, D., & Yilma, K. (2023). The content governance dilemma: digital constitutionalism, social media and the search for a global standard. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Katzenbach, C., Redeker, D., Magalhães, J. C., Kopps, A., Sühr, T., Caplan, R., … & Yilma, K. (2022). POLICING PLATFORMS: ADDRESSING POWER AND INEQUALITIES IN PLATFORM POLICIES. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research.
Celeste, E., Palladino, N., Redeker, D., & Yilma, K. (2022). Digital constitutionalism: in search of a content governance standard. In Celeste, E., Heldt, A., & Keller, C. I. (Eds.), Constitutionalising social media. (pp. 267-87). Oxford: Hart.
Redeker, D. (2019, November). Towards a European Constitution for the Internet? Comparative Institutionalization and Mobilization in European and Transnational Digital Constitutionalism.”. In GigaNet Annual Symposium.
Redeker, D (2019). Exploring the Bottom-Up Constitutionalism of the ‘Feminist Principles of the Internet’. SSRN http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85109255494&partnerID=MN8TOARS
Redeker, D. (2019). Venance Leonard Jeston Ntahondi*-Authoritarianism and Internet Governance-in Tanzania. The Center for Multilateral Affairs.
Redeker, D., Gill, L., & Gasser, U. (2018). Towards digital constitutionalism? Mapping attempts to craft an Internet Bill of Rights. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 302-319.
Rozgonyi, K. (2024). How to Modernize Media Laws to Cope With Digital Change. Tallinn/London/Santiago de Compostela: Media and Journalism Research Center.
Rozgonyi, K. (2024). A New Phase for Media Privilege Under Data Protection Law in Austria. European Data Protection Law Review, 1-3.
Rozgonyi, K. (2023). Accountability and platforms’ governance: the case of online prominence of public service media content. Internet Policy Review, 12(4).
Ranaivoson, H., & Rozgonyi, K. (2023). The Audiovisual Media Services Directive and the effectiveness of media transparency requirements. In European Audiovisual Policy in Transition (pp. 135-153). Routledge.
Kassa, B. E., Korbiel, I., Rozgonyi, K., Winter, L., & Sarikakis, K. (2023). Media Governance, supranationale Medienpolitik und Feminismus. In Handbuch Medien und Geschlecht: Perspektiven und Befunde der feministischen Kommunikations-und Medienforschung (pp. 509-527). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Rozgonyi, K., & Sarikakis, K. (2022). Policy Diffusion and Internet Governance. In M. Marzouki & Calderaro, A. (Eds.), Internet Diplomacy: Shaping the Global Politics of Cyberspace (pp. 195-211). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Heitz, L., Rozgonyi, K., Kostic, B., Wagner, D., & Haas, J. (2021). AI in Content Curation and Media Pluralism. In Spotlight on Artificial Intelligence and Freedom of Expression: A Policy Manual. Representative on Freedom of the Media, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.
Kolokytha, O., & Rozgonyi, K. (2021). From social distancing to digital un-distancing: The COVID-19 pandemic and new challenges for digital policy in the cultural and audio-visual sectors. Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 12(1), 177-184.
Rozgonyi, K. (2020). Disinformation online: potential legal and regulatory ramifications to the right to free elections–policy position paper. In Chatterjee, U., Loizides, F., & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human Computer Interaction and Emerging Technologies: Adjunct Proceedings from the INTERACT 2019, 57.
Rozgonyi, K. (2020). Negotiating new audiovisual rules for video sharing platforms: Proposals for a responsive governance model of speech online. Rev. Catalana Dret Pub., 61, 83-98.
Wagner, B., Rozgonyi, K., Sekwenz, M. T., Cobbe, J., & Singh, J. (2020, January). Regulating transparency? Facebook, twitter and the German network enforcement act. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 261-271).
Rozgonyi, K. (2019). The governance of digital switchover of terrestrial television in the European Union: The role of policy framing. Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 10(1), 67-87.
Rozgonyi, K. (2018). The governance of spectrum: a possible venue of accountability for global telecommunication. Digital policy, regulation and governance, 20(3), 273-287.
Pohle, J., Fischbach, R., & Lenk, K. (Eds.) (2024). Die gesellschaftliche Macht digitaler Technologien: Zwischen Wellen technologischen Überschwangs und den Mühen der Ebenen. Marburg, Germany: Metropolis-Verlag.
Dietrich, M., & Pohle, J. (2024). Robot Design for Social Intervenability. NordiCHI ’24: Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
Gubser, R., Schulte-Althoff, M., Heinemann, N., Pohle, J., & Fürstenau, D. (2023). Data Governance Strategies of Data Platforms: A Multiple Case Analysis in Nursing Care. ECIS 2023 Research-in-Progress Papers.
Pohle, J. (2022). “A Legal Discipline of the Future” – A Short History of the Intersection of Law and Computer Science. HIIG Discussion Paper Series, 2022(05).
Pohle, J. (2019). Privacy and Data Protection by Design: A Critical Perspective. In Milch, R.S., Benthall, S, & Potcovaru, A. (Eds.), Building Common Approaches for Cybersecurity and Privacy in a Globalized World (pp. 134–141). New York: New York University, Center for Cybersecurity.
Pohle, J. (2018). Datenschutz und Technikgestaltung: Geschichte und Theorie des Datenschutzes aus informatischer Sicht und Folgerungen für die Technikgestaltung. Berlin, Germany: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Puukko, O. (2024). Rethinking digital rights through systemic problems of communication. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (82), 1-19.
Puukko, O. (2024). Repensando los derechos digitales a través de los problemas sistémicos de la comunicación. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (82), 26.
Puukko, O. (2023). Productive Power in Digital Constitutionalism: Analyzing Civil Society Actors’ Definitions of Digital Rights. International Journal of Communication, 17, 6655-6674.
Nikunen, K. (2021). Dataistunut media. Media & viestintä, 44(2), i-vii.
Puukko, O. (2021). Kohti dataoikeudenmukaisuutta–ehdotuksia tutkijoilta ja liikkeiltä. Media & viestintä, 44(2), 145-153.
Karppinen, K., & Puukko, O. (2020). Four discourses of digital rights: Promises and problems of rights-based politics. Journal of Information Policy, 10, 304-328.
Pohle, J., & Santaniello, M. (2024). From multistakeholderism to digital sovereignty: Toward a new discursive order in internet governance?. Policy & Internet, 1-20.
Hoogenboom, S., Shahin, J., Morais, C., & Santaniello, M. (2024). Regional Digital Governance. In De Lombaerde, P., Handbook on Regional Cooperation and Integration (pp. 108-122). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Amoretti, F., & Santaniello, M. (2024). Sovranità e costituzionalismo digitale. In Tecnologia, Politica, Società (pp. 29-41). Mimesis.
Amoretti, F., & Santaniello, M. (2023). La corporation digitale pensa il mondo. In I Soggetti e le azioni della politica nella storia del pensiero (pp. 77-93). Edizioni ETS.
Celeste, E., Redeker, D., Santaniello, M., & Digital Constitutionalism Network. (2023). Anchoring Digital Rights: Digital Constitutionalism in Hard Times. In Padovani, C., Wavre, V., Hintz, A., Goggin, G., & Iosifidis, P. (Eds.), Global Communication Governance at the Crossroads (pp. 217-237). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Santaniello, M., & Palladino, N. (2022). Discourse Coalitions. In Marzouki, M., and Calderaro, A. (eds) Internet Governance. Internet Diplomacy: Shaping the Global Politics of Cyberspace. (pp. 61-84). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Santaniello, M., El-Shal, A., & Bouckaert, R. (2022). The EU and North Africa: towards a just twin transition. Policy Study. Brussels: The Foundation for European Progressive Studies.
Santaniello, M. (2022). Towards a democratic model of cybersecurity. In Financial Intelligence and Economic Security. An unknown Italian glory (pp. 117-128). Linea Edizioni.
Santaniello, M. (2022). Sovranità digitale e diritti fondamentali: un modello europeo di Internet governance. Rivista italiana di informatica e diritto, 4(1), 47-51.
Santaniello, M. (2021). La regolazione delle piattaforme e il principio della sovranità digitale. Rivista di Digital Politics, 1(3), 579-600.
Palladino, N., & Santaniello, M. (2021). Legitimacy, power, and inequalities in the multistakeholder Internet governance: Analyzing IANA transition. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Santaniello, M. (2021). From governance denial to state regulation: A controversy-based typology of Internet governance models.. In B. Haggart, N. Tusikov, & J.A. Scholte (Eds.), Power and authority in internet governance: Return of the state?. (pp. 15-36). London: Routledge.
Amoretti, F., & Santaniello, M. (2021). Sovranità (con) tese. Le digital corporation nello spazio pubblico globale. In La sovranità (pp. 175-194).
Santaniello, M. (2020). La visione politica dei sovrani della rete. Un’analisi dei discorsi pubblici di Mark Zuckerberg e Jack Ma. PARADOXA, 3(XIV), 103-113.
Santaniello, M. (2020). IL GIUDIZIO DI TALOS. VALUTAZIONE, ALGORITMI, MACCHINE/Talos’ Verdict. Evaluation, Algorithms and Machines. Cartografie sociali. Rivista semestrale di sociologia e scienze umane, 2(8).
Giannone, D., & Santaniello, M. (2019). Governance by indicators: the case of the Digital Agenda for Europe. Information, Communication & Society, 22(13), 1889-1902.
Santaniello, M., Palladino, N., Catone, M. C., & Diana, P. (2018). The language of digital constitutionalism and the role of national parliaments. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 320-336.
Santaniello, M. (2018). Internet Public Policy. Politiche pubbliche e governance delle reti digitali. Aracne editrice.
Santaniello, M. (2018). Rompere le scatole nere. Frontiere algoritmiche del giornalismo investigativo. COMUNICAZIONEPUNTODOC, 20, 55-65.
Padovani, C., & Santaniello, M. (2018). Introduction to The International Communication Gazette. Themed issue “Digital Constitutionalism: Human Rights and Power Limitation in the Internet Eco-system”. THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION GAZETTE, 80, 295-301.
Padovani, C., & Santaniello, M. (2018). Digital constitutionalism: Fundamental rights and power limitation in the Internet eco-system. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 295-301.
Schemeil, Y. (2022). Undiplomatic Ties: When Internet Blocks Intermediation. In Marzouki, M., and Calderaro, A. (Eds.), Internet diplomacy: shaping the global politics of cyberspace (pp. 21-43). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Fraser, H., & Suzor, N. (2024). Locating fault and responsibility for AI harms: A systems theory of foreseeability, reasonable care and causal responsibility in the AI value chain. Law, Innovation and Technology.
Cohen, T. & Suzor, N. (2024) Contesting the public interest in AI governance. Internet Policy Review, 13(3).
Lazar, S., Bucher, T., Korolova, A., O’Connor, C., & Suzor, N. (2021, July). Platform Power and AI: The Case of Content. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 2).
Huggins, A., Witt, A., Suzor, N., Burdon, M., & Governatori, G. (2021). The Legal and Coding Challenges of Digitising Commonwealth Legislation: Select Senate Committee on Financial Technology and Regulatory Technology Issues Paper Submission.
Suzor, N. (2020). A constitutional moment: How we might reimagine platform governance. The Computer Law and Security Report, 36.
Suzor, Nicolas (2020) Understanding content moderation systems: new methods to understand internet governance at scale, over time, and across platforms. In Whalen, Ryan (Ed.) Computational Legal Studies: The Promise and Challenge of Data-Driven Research. Edward Elgar Publishing, United Kingdom, pp. 166-189.
Gray, J., Hawkins, K., Montgomery, L., Neylon, C., O’Leary, B., Suzor, N., & Watkinson, C. A data trust for industry data sharing.
Matthew, A., Guihot, M., & Suzor, N. (2019). The Effective and Ethical Development of Artificial Intelligence: An Opportunity to Improve Our Wellbeing: Appeal Algorithmic Decisions.
Suzor, N. P. (2019). Lawless: The Secret Rules That Govern Our Digital Lives. United States: Cambridge University Press.
Neylon, C., Montgomery, L., Suzor, N., Gray, J., & Ozaygen, A. (2018). Building a trusted framework for coordinating OA monograph usage data. United States of America: Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
Mann, M., Pappalardo, K. M., & Suzor, N. P. (2018). Putting end-users in charge of algorithms: Privacy and autonomy ‘by design’. In Building an Equitable Tech Future.
Pohlmann, J., Barbaresi, A., & Leinen, P. (2023). Platform regulation and “overblocking”–The NetzDG discourse in Germany. Communications, 48(3), 395-419.
Wagner, B., Kettemann M. C., Tiedeke, A.S., Rachinger, F. & Sekwenz, M-T. (2024). Mapping interpretations of the law in online content moderation in Germany. Computer Law & Security Review, 55(2024).
Love Triangle? Mapping Interactions between International Human Rights Institutions, Meta, and its Oversight Board. European Journal of International Law, 34(4), 907-938 (2023).
Kettemann, M. C., Kraml, G., Rachinger, F., Rauchegger, C., & Tiedeke, A. S. (2021). Weltweite Löschpflichten für rechtswidrige Inhalte auf digitalen Plattformen vor dem österreichischen OGH. Der mühsame Weg zur Entfernung von Äußerungsrechtsverstößen in Social Media. Computer und Recht, 37(3), 154-159.
Kettemann, M. C., & Tiedeke, A. S. (2020). Online order in the age of many publics. Kybernetes, 50(4), 1004-1014.
Kettemann, M. C., & Tiedeke, A. S. (2020). Back up: can users sue platforms to reinstate deleted content? Internet Policy Review, 9(2).
Moncau, L. F. M., & Arguelhes, D. W. (2020). The Marco Civil da Internet and digital constitutionalism.
Wijermars, M. (2024). How ‘sovereign’ is Russia’s internet? Atlantisch Perspectief, 48(1), 15-17.
Makhortykh, M., & Wijermars, M. (2023). Can filter bubbles protect information freedom? Discussions of algorithmic news recommenders in Eastern Europe. Digital Journalism, 11(9), 1597-1621.
Lokot, T., & Wijermars, M. (2023). The politics of internet freedom rankings. Internet Policy Review, 12(2), 1-35.
Wijermars, M., & Lokot, T. (2022). Is Telegram a “harbinger of freedom”? The performance, practices, and perception of platforms as political actors in authoritarian states. Post-Soviet Affairs, 38(1-2), 125-145.
Wijermars, M. (2022). Selling internet control: the framing of the Russian ban of messaging app Telegram. Information, Communication & Society, 25(15), 2190-2206.
Makhortykh, M., Urman, A., & Wijermars, M. (2022). A story of (non) compliance, bias, and conspiracies: How Google and Yandex represented Smart Voting during the 2021 parliamentary elections in Russia. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 3(2), 1-16.
Dovbysh, O., Wijermars, M., & Makhortykh, M. (2022). How to reach Nirvana: Yandex, News personalisation, and the future of Russian journalistic media. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1855-1874.
Wijermars, M., & Makhortykh, M. (2022). Sociotechnical imaginaries of algorithmic governance in EU policy on online disinformation and FinTech. New media & society, 24(4), 942-963.
Pötzsch, H., Wijermars, M., Gritsenko, D., & Markham, A. (2022). Algorithms, contexts, governance: An introduction to the special issue. New Media & Society, 24(4), 835-844.
Burkhardt, F., & Wijermars, M. (2022). Digital Authoritarianism and Russia’s War Against Ukraine: How Sanctions-induced Infrastructural Disruptions are Reshaping Russia’s Repressive Capacities. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 42(2), 21-43.
Gritsenko, D., Markham, A., Pötzsch, H., & Wijermars, M. (2022). Algorithmic governance in context. New Media & Society, 24(4).
Gritsenko, D., Kopotev, M., & Wijermars, M. (2021). Digital Russia Studies: An Introduction. The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies, 1-12.
Sivetc, L., & Wijermars, M. (2021). The vulnerabilities of trusted notifier-models in Russia: The case of netoscope. Media and Communication, 9(4), 27-38.
Wijermars, M. (2021). Russia’s law ‘On news aggregators’: Control the news feed, control the news?. Journalism, 22(12), 2938-2954.
Wijermars, M. (2021). The digitalization of Russian politics and political participation. The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies, 15-32.
Lokot, T., & Wijermars, M. (2021). Russia’s Social Media Self-Censorship Law is Misguided–and the West Must Avoid Making the Same Mistake. CEPA. https://cepa.org/russias-social-media-self-censorship-law-is-misguided-and-the-west-must-avoid-making-the-same-mistake/.
Makhortykh, M., Urman, A., & Wijermars, M. (2021). Authoritarian news personalisation on Yandex. Zen during the 2021 Russian parliamentary elections. In Electoral Integrity and Malpractice in Russia and Beyond: New Challenges and Responses. International workshop. Helsinki, Finland.
Wijermars, M. (2020). The stakes are high for Internet freedom in Russia in 2020. Baltic Rim Economies, (1).
Wijermars, M., & Lokot, T. (2020). THE POLITICS OF INTERNET FREEDOM RANKINGS: A CALL FOR A COMPARATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING INTERNET FREEDOM. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research.
RATILAINEN, S., WIJERMARS, M., & WILMES. (2019). J. Re-framing Women and Technology in Global Digital Spaces: An Introduction. Studies in Russian, Eurasian, and East European New Media, 19, 1-10.
Wijermars, M., & Lehtisaari, K. (2019). Introduction: Freedom of expression in Russia’s new mediasphere. In Freedom of Expression in Russia’s New Mediasphere (pp. 1-14). New York: Routledge.
Wijermars, M. (2018). Mass Media and the Legitimation of Internet Control in Russia: The Case of Telegram. Aleksanteri-Instituutti. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research.
Ratilainen, S. M., Wijermars, M., & Wilmes, J. (2018). Women and Tech in the Post-socialist Context: Intelligence, Creativity, Transgression. Studies in Russian, Eurasian, and East European New Media, 19.
Miazhevich, G., Wijermars, M., Gapova, E., & Zvereva, V. (2018). POLITICS, ACTIVISM AND TROLLING ON THE RUSSIAN INTERNET. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research.
Wimmer, M. (2022). Foreword: Advancements and challenges for Latin American AI and data governance. Computer Law & Security Review, 47, 105759.
Wimmer, M., & Moraes, T. G. (2022). Quantum computing, digital constitutionalism, and the right to encryption: perspectives from Brazil. Digital Society, 1(2), 12.
Wimmer, M. (2021). Limits and Possibilities Regarding the Secondary Use of Personal Data in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Pandemic. Braz. J. Pub. Pol’y, 11, 123.
Henry, N., Witt, A., & Vasil, S. (2024). A ‘design justice’ approach to developing digital tools for addressing gender-based violence: exploring the possibilities and limits of feminist chatbots. Information, Communication & Society, 1-24.
Witt, A., Henry, N., & Beard, G. (2024). Judicial Constructions of Harm in Australian Image-Based Sexual Abuse Case Law: A Feminist Discourse Analysis. Social & Legal Studies, 09646639241233992.
Henry, N., Vasil, S., & Witt, A. (2022). Digital citizenship in a global society: a feminist approach. Feminist Media Studies, 22(8), 1972-1989.
Huggins, A., Burdon, M., Witt, A., & Suzor, N. (2022). Digitising legislation: connecting regulatory mind-sets and constitutional values. Law, Innovation and Technology, 14(2), 325-354.
Henry, N., & Witt, A. (2021). Governing image-based sexual abuse: Digital platform policies, tools, and practices. In The Emerald international handbook of technology-facilitated violence and abuse (pp. 749-768). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Witt, A., Suzor, N., & Huggins, A. (2019). The rule of law on Instagram: An evaluation of the moderation of images depicting women’s bodies. The University of New South Wales Law Journal, 42(2), 557-596.
Yilma, K. (2024). From Principles to Process: The Principlist Approach to AI Ethics and Lessons from Internet Bills of Rights. Addis Ababa School of Law Working Paper Series, (02).
Celeste, E., Palladino, N., Redeker, D., & Yilma, K. (2023). The content governance dilemma: digital constitutionalism, social media and the search for a global standard. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Yilma, K.. (2023) Emerging Technologies and Human Rights at the United Nations. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 42:1, 54-64.
Yilma, K. (2023). Privacy and the Role of International Law in the Digital Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Celeste, E., Palladino, N., Redeker, D., & Yilma, K. (2022). Digital constitutionalism: in search of a content governance standard. In Celeste, E., Heldt, A., & Keller, C. I. (Eds.) Constitutionalising social media. (pp. 267-87). Oxford: Hart.
Yilma, K. M. (2021). On Disinformation, Elections and Ethiopian Law. Journal of African Law, 65(3), 351–375.
Yilma, K. M. (2021). Bill of rights for the 21st century: some lessons from the Internet Bill of Rights movement. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(4), 701–716.
Yilma, K. M. (2019). The United Nations data privacy system and its limits. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 33(2), 224-248.
Yilma, K. (2019). The United Nations’ Evolving Privacy Discourse and Corporate Human Rights Obligations. ASIL Insights, 23(4).
Yilma, K. M. (2018). The ‘Right to Privacy in the Digital Age’: Boundaries of the ‘New’un Discourse. Nordic journal of international law, 87(4), 485-528.
Zalnieriute M. (2024). Facial recognition surveillance and public space: protecting protest movements. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology.
Zalnieriute, M. (2024). Beyond Procedural Fetishism: The Inadequacy of GDPR in Regulating Facial Recognition Technologies and Public Space Surveillance. In Ebers, M., & Sein, K. (Eds.), Privacy, Data Protection and Data-driven Technologies (pp. 328-367). London: Routledge.
Zalnieriute, M. (2023). Against Procedural Fetishism: A Call for a New Digital Constitution. Ind. J. Global Legal Stud., 30, 227.
Bell, F., Bennett Moses, L., Legg, M., Silove, J., & Zalnieriute, M. (2023). AI Decision-Making and the Courts: A Guide for Judges, Tribunal Members and Court Administrators. Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration.
Zalnieriute M. (2022). Reforming the Australian Framework for International Data Sharing. International Data Privacy Law, 12, 332 – 345.
Zalnieriute M, & Churches G. (2021). Rejecting the Transatlantic Outsourcing of Data Protection in the Face of Unrestrained Surveillance. Cambridge Law Journal, 80, 8 – 11.
Zalnieriute M. (2021). Burning Bridges: Facial Recognition Technology and Public Space Surveillance in the Modern State’, Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 22(2), 284 – 304.
Zalnieriute, M. (2021). ” Transparency Washing” in the Digital Age: A Corporate Agenda of Procedural Fetishism. Critical Analysis L., 8, 139.
Churches, G., & Zalnieriute, M. (2020). “Contracting Out” Human Rights in International Law: Schrems II and the Fundamental Flaws of U.S. Surveillance Law’, Harvard International Law Journal, https://harvardilj.org/2020/08/contracting-out-human-rights-in-international-law-schrems-ii-and-the-fundamental-flaws-of-u-s-surveillance-law/.
Zalnieriute, M. (2020). Human Rights Rhetoric in Global Internet Governance: New ICANN Bylaw on Human Rights. Harvard Business Law Review (2020) Vol, 10, 20-6.
Zalnieriute, M. (2020). Beyond the Governance Gap in International Domain Name Law: Bringing the UDRP in Line with Internationally Recognized Human Rights. Stanford Journal of International Law, 56, 79 – 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3532799.
Zalnieriute, M. (2019). From Human Rights Aspirations to Enforceable Obligations by Non-State Actors in the Digital Age: The Case of Internet Governance and ICANN. Yale JL & Tech., 21, 278.
Zalnieriute, M., Burton, L., Boughey, J., Bennett Moses, L., & Logan, S. (2019). From rule of law to statute drafting: legal issues for algorithms in government decision-making. In Barfield, W. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Law of Algorithms (pp. 251-272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zalnieriute, M. (2019). Digital rights of LGBTI communities: a roadmap for a dual human rights framework. In Research Handbook on Human Rights and Digital Technology (pp. 411-434). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Zalnieriute, M. (2019). The Necessity for Binding Human Rights Obligations for Private Actors in the Digital Age: A Submission to the UN Human Rights Council on New and Emerging Technologies. UNSW Law Research Paper, 19-81.
Zalnieriute, M., & Milan, S. (2019). Internet architecture and human rights: Beyond the human rights gap. Policy & Internet, 11(1), 6-15.